Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025): (Regular Issue in Progress)
Research Article

Promoting Transdisciplinarity and Competency-based Learning Using Web GIS in the Spanish Secondary School Classroom

Miguel-Ángel Puertas-Aguilar
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Spain
Javier Álvarez-Otero
Universidad a Distancia de Madrid (UDIMA), Spain
María-Luisa de Lázaro-Torres
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Spain
Types of approaches of interaction of disciplines

Published 2025-10-04

Keywords

  • web-based GIS learning,
  • citizenship,
  • transdiciplinarity,
  • competency,
  • education for sustainability

How to Cite

Puertas-Aguilar, Miguel-Ángel, Javier Álvarez-Otero, and María-Luisa de Lázaro-Torres. 2025. “Promoting Transdisciplinarity and Competency-Based Learning Using Web GIS in the Spanish Secondary School Classroom”. European Journal of Geography 16 (2):335-48. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.m.pue.16.2.335.348.
Received 2025-03-10
Accepted 2025-09-29
Published 2025-10-04

Abstract

In today´s world, education systems must adapt to stay connected with the real world. Three key elements meet these demands: the interaction between disciplines and their varying levels of complexity, the competency-based approach of the Spanish education system, and the use of web-based GIS tools for teaching and learning with a transdisciplinary approach. In this context, Spain offers a promising context to explore the integration of these elements, given its educational reforms and digital strategy. However, there are no studies in secondary schools in Spain integrating these elements. The objective of this research is to demonstrate that web GIS serves as a valuable resource for engagement in the real world, representing information on maps for teaching and learning within a transdisciplinary competency-based framework. The methodology applied follows the action-research model mainly based on classroom observations and students’ satisfaction surveys. Several stages have been considered: a) planning: identifying a relevant problem or topic to improve learning outcomes; b) action: class intervention by collecting necessary information, categorizing information, analysing the problem, formulating hypotheses and creating a layer for a collaborative map; c) results and interventions assessments. Following this methodology, three interventions are presented. The sample is a convenience sample with 187 students aged 15 to 18 (ISCED 3: 4th-year Compulsory Secondary Education -K-10, ages 15–16- and ISCED 4: 2nd-year Baccalaureate -K-12, ages 17–18-), from a Spanish educational institution. It can be stated that the collaborative use of web-based GIS in secondary education enhances engagement, representation of information, and increases interaction. All these actions improve sustainability, digital, learning to learn and citizenship competencies and promote transdisciplinarity.

Highlights:

  • Collaborative use of web GIS improves the engagement of students in Secondary School.
  • Cartography based on the use of web GIS drives the transdisciplinary approach.
  • Interventions evaluate sustainability, digital, learn to learn and citizenship competencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Acevedo-Osorio, Á., Hofmann-Souki, S. & Cruz Morales, J. (2020). Holistic competence orientation in sustainability-related study programmes: lessons from implementing transdisciplinary student team research in Colombia, China, Mexico and Nicaragua. Sustainability Science, 15, 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00687-8
  2. Akiri, І. (2021). Transdiciplinary as an educational paradigm of the future. Education: Modern Discourses, (4), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.37472/2617-3107-2021-4-04
  3. Álvarez-Otero, J., De Miguel-González, R. & Sebastián López, M. (2024). El diseño participativo: un enfoque innovador para la educación geográ-fica en las aulas de Secundaria. ENSAYOS, Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.18239/ensayos
  4. Álvarez-Otero, J. & De Lázaro y Torres, M.L. (2018). Education in Sustainable Development Goals Using the Spatial Data Infrastructures and the TPACK Model. Education Sciences, 8, 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040171
  5. Argibay, J.C. (2009). Muestra en investigación cuantitativa. Subjetividad y Procesos Cognitivos, 13(1), 13-29. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339630252001
  6. Azzari, M., Zamperlin, P. & Landi, F. (2013). GIS in geography teaching. Journal of research and didactics in geography, 2(2), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.4458/2379-03
  7. Baker, T. R. (2015). WebGIS in education. In O. Muñiz Solari, A. Demirci, & J. Schee (Eds.), Geospatial technologies and geography education in a changing world: Geospatial practices and lessons learned (pp. 105-115). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55519-3_9
  8. Bednarz, S.W. (2004). Geographic Information Systems: A Tool to Support Geography and Environmental Education? GeoJournal, 60(2), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000033574.44345.c9
  9. Blanchard Giménez, M. & Muzás Rubio, D. M. (2024). Retos y desafíos en la formación del profesorado universitario. Revista HISTEDBR On-line Campinas, 24, e024028-e024028. https://doi.org/10.20396/rho.v24i00.8674718
  10. Buzo, I.J. (2021). Aprendizaje inteligente y pensamiento espacial en Geografía. (Doctoral Thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid). https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/3439
  11. Buzo-Sánchez, I.J., Mínguez, C. & De Lázaro-Torres, M.L. (2022). Expert perspectives on GIS use in Spanish geographic education. International Journal of Digital Earth, 15(1), 1205-1219. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2022.2096131
  12. Carbonell-Carrera, C., Saorin, J.L. & Hess-Medler, S.A. (2020). Geospatial Thinking Multiyear Study. Sustainability, 12, 4586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114586
  13. Cárdenas, J. (2018). Investigación cuantitativa. Trandes. http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-216
  14. Carlos, V., & Moreira, A. (2012, August 26-30). Contributions of transdisciplinary teaching and learning strategies supported by Geographic In-formation Systems to education for sustainable development – The point of view of the teacher [Conference presentation]. 32nd Interna-tional Geographic Congress “Down to Earth”, Cologne, Germany. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322316968_Contributions_of_transdisciplinary_teaching_and_learning_strategies_supported_by_Geographic_Information_Systems_to_Education_for_Sustainable_Development_-_the_point_of_view_of_the_teacher
  15. Choi, B.C. & Pak, A.W. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale, 29(6), 351–364. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17330451/
  16. Clark, B. & Button, C. (2011). Sustainability Transdisciplinary Education Model: Interface of Arts, Science, and Community (STEM). International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371111098294
  17. Council of Europe. (2018). Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture. Council of Europe Publish-ing. https://www.coe.int/en/web/reference-framework-of-competences-for-democratic-culture/rfcdc-volumes
  18. Daneshpour, H. & Kwegyir-Afful, E. (2022). Analysing Transdisciplinary Education: A Scoping Review. Science & Education, 31, 1047–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00277-0
  19. De Lázaro Torres, M.L. & Morales Yago, F.J. (n.d.) Investigación en innovación en la enseñanza de la geografía empleando tecnologías en la nube: mapas web y story maps. https://arcg.is/1a4GXT
  20. De Lázaro, M.L., Sánchez, I.B. & De Miguel González, R. (2023). Cartoteca digital de biografías de literatos europeos en Story Maps. Boletín de la Real Sociedad Geográfica, CLXI, 159-168. https://www.boletinrsg.com/index.php/boletinrsg/article/view/211
  21. De Lázaro-Torres, ML., Puertas-Aguilar, MÁ., and Álvarez-Otero, J. (2023). Education for Sustainability Using Coud-Based Geographic Information Systems at University. In: Klonari, A., De Lázaro y Torres, M.L., Kizos, A. (eds) Re-visioning Geography. Key Challenges in Geography. Book Se-ries: Key Challenges in Geography (pp.137-152). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40747-5_8
  22. De Miguel González, R. & De Lázaro Torres, M. L. (2020). WebGIS implementation and effectiveness in secondary education using the digital atlas for schools. Journal of Geography, 119(2), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2020.1726991
  23. De Miguel González, R. (2024). Powerful geography and the future of geographic education. Dialogues in Human Geography, 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206241229219
  24. Delice, A. (2010). The Sampling Issues in Quantitative Research. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice, 10(4), 2001-2018. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ919871
  25. European Union. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning (2006/962/EC). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX%3A32006H0962%3AES%3AHTML
  26. European Union (2018). Council Recommendation on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. Official Journal of the European Union, C 189/01. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=oj:JOC_2018_189_R_0001
  27. Fargher, M., & Healy, G. (2020). Empowering geography teachers and students with geographical knowledge: Epistemic access through GIS. In N. Walshe & G. Healy (Eds.), Geography education in the digital world (pp. 102-116). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429274909
  28. Fiala, V., Freyer, B., Klimek, M. & Fahringer, A. (2018). How do you teach transdisciplinary competences for food and farming systems research? Insights from the course System Analysis and Scenario Technique. Open Agriculture, 3, 553-566. https://doi:10.1515/opag-2018-0059
  29. García-Juan, L. & Vallina-Rodríguez, A. (2019). SIG y bases de datos. Oportunidades y retos en la transición de los sistemas tradicionales al Big Data; GIS and databases. Opportunities and Challenges in the Transition from Traditional Systems to Big Data. Espacio Tiempo y Forma. Se-rie VI, Geografia, 12, 135–158. https://doi-org.bibliotecauned.idm.oclc.org/10.5944/etfvi.12.2019.25124
  30. Government of Spain. (2006). Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/lo/2006/05/03/2/con
  31. Humble, N. (2023). Future Paths for GIS in K-12 Education: A Review of Possibilities and Constraints. European Journal of Geography, 14(3), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.n.hum.14.3.079.088
  32. Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J.T., Bruun, H. & Hukkinen, J. (2010). Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011
  33. Jo, I., Hong, J.E. & Verma, K. (2016). Facilitating spatial thinking in world geography using Web-based GIS. Journal of Geography in Higher Educa-tion, 40(3), 442-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1150439
  34. Kerski, J. J. (2023). Teaching and learning geography with a web GIS approach. In: A. Klonari A, M.L. De Lázaro y Torres & A. Kizos (Eds.), Re-visioning geography: Supporting the SDGs in the post-COVID era (pp. 113-135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40747-5_7
  35. Klingman, L.L. (2021). Let's Get Digital! Using ESRIs ArcGIS StoryMaps as an Archaeological Education Tool. (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Binghamton). https://bit.ly/3f2RsFE
  36. Kubisch, S., Parth, S., Deisenrieder, V., Oberauer, K., Stötter, J., & Keller, L. (2021). From transdisciplinary research to transdisciplinary educa-tion—The role of schools in contributing to community well-being and sustainable development. Sustainability, 13(306). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010306
  37. Lage Gómez, C. (2020). Aproximación transdisciplinar a la Música Popular Urbana en Enseñanza Secundaria. Estudios pedagógicos (Valdi-via), 46(2), 159-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052020000200159
  38. Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
  39. Lee, J. & Bednarz, R. (2012). Components of Spatial Thinking: Evidence from a Spatial Thinking Ability Test. Journal of Geography, 111(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2011.583262
  40. Leininger-Frézal, C., Sprenger, S., De Lázaro-Torres, M. L., Rodríguez-Domenech, M. Á., Heidari, N., Pigaki, M., Naudet, C., Lecomte, A., & Gallar-do, M. (2023). Global change challenge in the higher education curriculum on the approach of blended learning. European Journal of Geog-raphy, 14(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.c.lei.14.2.001.014
  41. Lemoine, P. A., Hackett, P. T., & Richardson, M. D. (2017). Global higher education and VUCA – Volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity. In S. Mukerji & P. Tripathi (Eds.), Handbook of research on administration, policy, and leadership in higher education (pp. 549-568). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0672-0.ch022
  42. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
  43. Ma, Q., Duan, Y. & Yao, Z. (2023). Meta-analysis of the impact of geospatial technologies on learning outcomes. Education and Information Tech-nologies, 28, 15739-15764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11712-w
  44. Martínez-Hernández, C. (2025). Evaluación de competencias geográficas permitiendo el uso discente de la IA generativa. Interdisciplinary Journal of Didactics, 2. https://doi.org/10.14198/ijd.28999
  45. Martínez-Hernández, C. & Mínguez, C. (2023). The Anthropocene and the sustainable development goals: key elements in geography higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(7), 1648-1667. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2022-0316
  46. Martínez-Miguélez, M. (2004). Ciencia y Arte en la metodología cualitativa. Trillas.
  47. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (4th Ed.). Sage. https://bit.ly/3SdZUG0
  48. Milson, A. J. (2011). GIS in the cloud: Using WebGIS for teaching secondary geography. Didáctica Geográfica, 12, 151-153. https://didacticageografica.age-geografia.es/index.php/didacticageografica/article/view/66
  49. Mínguez, C. (2021). Teaching tourism: urban routes design using GIS Story Map. Investigaciones Geográficas, 75, 25-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/INGEO2020.M
  50. Ministry of Education and Professional Training of Spain. (2022). Real Decreto 217/2022, de 29 de marzo, por el que se establece la ordenación y las enseñanzas mínimas de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Boletín Oficial del Estado. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2022/03/29/217/con
  51. Morales, M.P. (2019). Education in a VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, Ambiguous) World. The Normal Lights, 13(2), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.56278/tnl.v13i2.2062
  52. Mukherjee, F. (2019). Exploring cultural geography field course using story maps. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(2), 201-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1597031
  53. Murga-Menoyo, M.Á. (2015). Competencias para el desarrollo sostenible: Las capacidades, actitudes y valores meta de la educación en el marco de la Agenda global post-2015. Foro de Educación, 19, 55–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.2015.013.019.004
  54. Nicolescu, B. (1999). La evolución transdisciplinaria del aprendizaje. Trans-pasando Fronteras, 4, 39-50. https://doi:10.18046/retf.i4.1779
  55. OECD. (2005). Definition and Selection of Competencies (DeSeCo). Executive Summary 2005. https://www.deseco.ch/bfs/deseco/en/index/02.parsys.43469.downloadList.2296.DownloadFile.tmp/2005.dskcexecutivesummary.en.pdf
  56. OECD (2024), Insights from Skills Strategies in the European Union: Lessons Learnt for Developing and Implementing Effective Skills Policies, OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/0bf9e78e-en
  57. Pérez-Van-Leenden, M.J. (2019). La investigación acción en la práctica docente. Un análisis bibliométrico (2003-2017). Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 12(24), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m12-24.ncev
  58. Pons, J.J., Armendáriz, J. & Andreu, J. (2019). El story-map como herramienta didáctica y divulgativa en el ámbito de la Arqueología. In C. Ortega, M.Á. López-González & P. Amor Hernández (Eds.), Innovación educativa en la era digital: libro de actas (pp. 311-316). UNED. https://congresos.uned.es/w17905/15834
  59. Puertas Aguilar, M. Á., Conway, B., De Lázaro-Torres, M.L., De Miguel González, R., Donert, K., Linder-Fally, M., Parkinson, A., Prodan, D., Wilson, S. & Zwartjes, L.A. (2022). Teaching Model to Raise Awareness of Sustainability Using Geoinformation: Un modelo docente para sensibilizar sobre la sostenibilidad empleando la geoinformación. Espacio Tiempo y Forma. Serie VI, 15, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.5944/etfvi.15.2022.33687
  60. Puertas-Aguilar, M.-Á., Álvarez-Otero, J. & De-Lázaro-Torres, M.L. (2021). The Challenge of Teacher Training in the 2030 Agenda Framework Using Geotechnologies. Education Sciences, 11(8), 381. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080381
  61. Puertas-Aguilar, M.Á., Sipols, A.E.G. & De Lázaro-Torres, M.L. (2023). Web GIS to learn geopolitics in secondary education: A case study from Spain. European Journal of Geography 2023, 14(2), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.m.pue.14.2.015.031
  62. Punie, Y. & Bacigalupo, M. (Eds.). (2022). GreenComp. The European sustainability competence framework. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/13286
  63. Rodán, A., Contreras, M.J., Elosúa, M.R. & Gimeno, P. (2016). Experimental but not sex differences of a mental rotation training program on adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01050
  64. Sala, A., Punie, Y., Garkov, V. & Cabrera Giraldez, M. (2020). LifeComp: The European Framework for Personal, Social and Learning to Learn Key Competence. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/922681
  65. Salgado-Escobar, G. & Aguilar-Fernández, M. (2021). Hacia la transformación de los estudiantes: un proceso transdisciplinario para la educación superior. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 12(23), https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v12i23.1057
  66. Santaella Vallejo, A. & Ruiz Simón, E. (2023). La transdisciplinariedad educativa: análisis del marco conceptual, metodologías, contexto y medi-ción. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 92(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie9215747
  67. Santos, B., Gonçalves, J., Martins, A.M., Pérez-Cano, M.T., Mosquera-Adell, E., Dimelli, D., Lagarias, A. & Almeida, P.G. (2021). GIS in Architectural teaching and Research: Planning and Heritage. Education Sciences, 11(6), 307. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060307
  68. Santos, M.J.S., Carlos, V. & Moreira, A.A. (2023). Building the Bridge to a Participatory Citizenship: Curricular Integration of Communal Environ-mental Issues in School Projects Supported by the Internet of Things. Sensors, 23, 3070. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2306307
  69. Scott, C. (2015). El futuro del aprendizaje 2. ¿Qué tipo de aprendizaje se necesita en el siglo XXI?. UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000242996_spa
  70. Sebastián López M., Kratochvíl O. & De Miguel González R. (2023). Geographic education and spatial citizenship: Collaborative mapping for learn-ing the local environment in a global context. In: A. Klonari A, M.L. De Lázaro y Torres & A. Kizos (Eds.), Re-visioning geography: Key chal-lenges in geography. Springer (pp. 177-191). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40747-5_10
  71. Sipos, Y., Battisti, B. & Grimm, K. (2008). Achieving transformative sustainability learning: engaging head, hands and heart. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 68-86. https://doi:10.1108/14676370810842193
  72. Spain. (2020). Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación [Organic Law 3/2020, of December 29, which amends Organic Law 2/2006, of May 3, on Education]. Boletín Oficial del Estado, núm. 340, December 30, 2020, pp. 122868–122953. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/lo/2020/12/29/3
  73. Strachan, C. & Mitchell, J. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of Esri Story Maps as effective teaching tools. Review of International Geographical Edu-cation Online, 4(3), 195-220. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/rigeo/issue/40895/493771#article_cite
  74. UNESCO (n.d.). Transforming Education Towards SDG 4: report of a global survey on country actions to transform education 2024. Retrieved Octo-bre 28, 2024, from: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/transforming-education-towards-sdg4-report-global-survey-country-actions-transform-education
  75. UNESCO. (2014). UNESCO roadmap for implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230514
  76. UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. UNESCO Digital Li-brary. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444.locale=en
  77. Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S. & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens - With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/490274
  78. Viehrig, K., & Siegmund, A. (2012). Germany: Diverse GIS implementations within a diverse educational landscape. In A. Milson, A. Demirci, & J. Kerski (Eds.), International Perspectives on Teaching and Learning with GIS in Secondary Schools (pp. 107-115) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2120-3_12
  79. Waller, R.E., Lemoine, P.A., Mense, E.G., Garretson, C.J. & Richardson, M. D. (2019). Global Higher Education in a VUCA World: Concerns and Projections. Journal of Education and Development, 3(2), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v3i2.613
  80. Wilson, B., Wilson, N. & Sierra, M. (2021). Using GIS to Advance Social Economics Research: Geocoding, Aggregation, and Spatial Thinking. Forum for Social Economics, 50(4), 480-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2018.1509798